GSPI States: Some Biofuels Add Significant Food to Your Table
SAN DIEGO (Business Wire EON/PRWEB ) November 9, 2007 --
Green Star Products, Inc. (OTC:GSPI) responds to the recent
comments by Jean Ziegler, the United Nations Special Reporter of the
Right to Food, wherein he said that using food crops for biofuels
amounts to a “crime against humanity.”
Mr. Ziegler’s remarks carefully describe
conventional ethanol’s impact in using “food
for fuel.” Whereas Biodiesel, which is also a
biofuel, is produced in the U.S. from soybeans and provides an enormous
amount of high protein human food along with each gallon of biodiesel it
produces.
Some of the actual unpublished facts are as follows:
For each bushel (60 pounds) of soybeans produced only 10 pounds of
extracted oil is used in making biodiesel. The other 50 pounds (the soy
meal) is used to feed the hungry of the world as one of the best high
protein foods available.
Therefore, any increase in demand for soy oil to produce U.S. fuel
actually creates an additional significant amount of food for our tables.
Some uninformed world leaders are now even considering a 5-year
moratorium on the production of biofuels worldwide because of inadequate
information concerning biofuels.
Mr. Joseph LaStella, President of Green Star Products, has been
publishing editorials concerning Global Warming and Peak Oil for many
years. Unfortunately many of Mr. LaStella's predictions have now come
true (see GreenStarUSA.com).
Let's review the real situation and solution concerning biofuels.
The U.S. Congress passed a provision in the 2005 energy bill called the
renewable fuels standard which required oil companies to blend 7.5
billion gallons of renewable fuels into the nation's fuel supply by
2012. To the surprise of many people including our congress this goal
will be achieved in 2008, four years ahead of schedule.
Ethanol, also a biofuel, uses corn as its feedstock and uses the entire
bushel of corn for its production. Ethanol production (unlike biodiesel)
removes vast amounts of food from the global markets.
The recent massive private investment to build ethanol plants was fueled
by the mandated ethanol requirements and the high-anticipated profits
projected by these mandated ethanol requirements. In 2006, spot prices
for ethanol exceeded $5 per gallon on the west coast. The American
industrial might and greed rose to the occasion and built ethanol plants
to reach a federal production goal four years early.
This is good and bad at the same time; the U.S. certainly proved that we
could rise to the occasion given the right incentive (profits).
However, the ethanol feedstock supply, mainly corn, was not ready for
this abrupt change. Corn prices doubled sending protests around the
world. Price of basic food goods in Mexico, India, and other countries
increased dramatically and sparked formal protests to the U.S.
This is only part of the story; with corn prices almost doubling the
American farmers also saw a great opportunity to cash in on profits and
a domino effect began to take place. Many farmers strayed from the time
proven crop rotation method and began growing corn on the same land year
after year. A new slang phrase "corn on corn on corn" summarizes this
practice. This also destroys, or at least depletes, the topsoil with the
temptation of short-term big profits winning out in many cases.
The next domino to fall was that soybean farmers decided to also switch
to corn to cash in on profits thus reducing soybean production. This
switch also reduces the human edible food from our tables, a real double
whammy to the hungry.
Add some bad global agricultural weather to the equation and you have
increased world hunger.
Further complications include some real corn storage problems this year
since corn is harvested once per year, however ethanol plants run all
year long. Ethanol plants usually only have storage for a 10-day supply.
Therefore, adequate storage silos were not available to store some of
the corn crop and it began to rot rendering it unsuitable for either
ethanol production or human consumption. Silo construction has a 3-year
backlog. A real good business to be in this year was the silo
construction business, which is booming.
The domino effect continued and the effect of recent record high prices
for soy bean oil resulted in many biodiesel plants across the U.S.
shutting down with bankruptcy as a possibility. This will mean less
alternative fuel to run our transportation industry and less high
protein food for our tables. Remember the transportation industry runs
mainly on diesel with biodiesel as a blend and not on ethanol!
It is now evident that corn feedstock is not a real long-term solution
to our fuel shortage. However, it will be a partial answer as the same
holds true for soy oil based biodiesel. Neither of these products alone
can possibly wean the U.S. off foreign oil for energy independence.
There is just not enough prime agricultural land available.
Let’s talk about Brazil ethanol. Brazil has
been using ethanol since the 1970s and utilizes sugarcane as its
feedstock. Sugarcane feedstock to make ethanol is more efficient than
the U.S. corn ethanol.
People didn’t realize that the present U.S.
ethanol production capacity already exceeds the entire Brazil production
capacity. If Brazil expanded its present capacity by its planned 80%
increase in five years, to the 9.5 billion gallons level, that would
still only represent less than 3% of the U.S. daily oil requirements
even if Brazil gave the U.S. all of its ethanol, which of course is not
going to happen.
U.S. ethanol giants, ADM, Cargill and Bunge, are hungry for a foothold
into the Brazil ethanol market except Brazilian families have so far
rejected offers.
ADM’s chief strategist, Steve Mills, said his
company needs to capture know-how for growing and processing sugarcane. “The
one thing we do know here is that we’re going
to have to acquire some expertise in the area,”
said Mr. Mills.
Brazil ethanol is certainly not a long-term solution to U.S. energy
independence; it can only be a small patch on an ever growing hole in
the U.S. fuel crisis.
Other supplies of feedstock such as canola oil from Canada and increased
U.S. production of canola oil can certainly fill another domestic
production gap in the fuel chain. Canola seed produces 140 gallons of
oil per acre per year versus 50 gallons for soybeans. Canola oil is an
excellent feedstock for biodiesel production.
Contrary to the belief of many biofuel industries experts, palm oil from
Asia is not an acceptable alternative feedstock for biodiesel.
Palm oil from Asia is not making the U.S. more energy independent.
Furthermore there is a growing world protest against biodiesel
production from palm oil because there is massive destruction of rain
forests to clear the way for palm oil plantations.
People are already talking about banning the use of palm oil for biofuel
to save the rain forests.
Palm oil production adds to Global Warming first by burning the rain
forest and further adds to Global Warming by eliminating the rain forest
to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, which is the major Global Warming
gas. This is not an acceptable alternative fuel solution.
The palm oil situation is becoming a global issue. Indonesia’s
government is now asking global investors to pay their country not to
cut and burn its pristine rain forest in order to make room for palm oil
plantations.
The big question is: Is there an answer to Global Warming and the
Energy Crisis? Absolutely yes!
However, the U.S. is about 10 years late in exercising such a program.
What does all this mean? In the mid 1970s the U.S. launched two
programs, which could have helped avert today's fuel and Global Warming
crises.
Both of these programs (which lasted over 15 years) provided the
essential stepping stones to a successful solution. They were the USDA
Aquatic Species Program, which studied algae as a fuel source, and the
cellulosic ethanol programs, which utilized waste agricultural products
(i.e. rice stalks, corn stalks, wood chips, municipal waste, etc.) to
produce ethanol. Both of these programs were cancelled under President
Clinton’s administration because certain
industry experts did not see foreign oil imports as a matter of national
security and that oil prices would not increase beyond $20 per barrel in
the foreseeable future.
Mr. LaStella has been preaching these facts for years and is documented
in many publications (see Green Star Products website GreenStarUSA.com)
on Global Warming, Peak Oil, Algae (see press releases dated July 19,
July 9, May 18 and May 11, 2007), the two-minute Continental Airlines
type documentary, three radio interviews to mention a few -- all on
GSPI's website GreenStarUSA.com.
Algae is the ultimate answer for biodiesel fuel, just consider the
following:
-
Algae produce 100 times more oil per acre than traditional food
oilseed crops such as soy etc. (Note: Algae produces 4000 gallons of
oil per acre per year versus 50 gallons per acre for soy.)
-
Algae eat CO2, the major Global Warming Gas, and produce oxygen.
-
Algae require only sunshine and non-drinkable (salt or brackish) water.
-
Algae do not compete with food crops for either agricultural land or
fresh water.
-
Algae can reproduce themselves and their oil every 6 hours, while it
takes Mother Nature millions of years to produce crude oil in the
ground.
GSPI has organized a Consortium of companies with far reaching research
and experience in all of these advanced technologies including
cellulosic ethanol, algae, biogas, etc.
The future refineries will be biorefineries, which will utilize only
non-food waste products such as agricultural waste, municipal waste,
manure and algae as feedstock and will produce ethanol, biodiesel,
animal food, fertilizer, electricity, heat and a variety of specialized
chemical products essential for the U.S. industry.
While efforts in the U.S. are just beginning to research cellulosic
ethanol, two of GSPI consortium partners are engaged with an India
chemical company to start construction of the first commercial
cellulosic ethanol plant in India based on years of privately funded
research here in the U.S.
The India plant will utilize a patented (non-enzyme) production process.
GSPI Consortium partners have a common goal to combine their
technologies to build the first complete Biorefinery using only waste
products as feedstock.
Each of the Consortium technologies can be used independently to produce
specific energy, fuel, fertilizer, agricultural food and assorted
chemicals. However, when combined into one facility the advantages
become impressive.
Each of the Consortium members has agreed to license each other for
specific projects. However, the Ultimate Biorefinery is still the goal!
Green Star Products will participate in the biodiesel production and
algae processing facility portion of these biorefineries.
Each of the Consortium companies is now actively engaged in building
individual facilities. However, there is significant global interest in
building the first Biorefinery.
Potential financial partners are now negotiating the financing for the
Biorefinery concept.
All members of the Consortium agree that the first Biorefinery should be
built in the U.S.
Green Star Products, Inc. (OTC:GSPI) (OTC:GSPI.PK) is an environmentally
friendly company dedicated to creating innovative cost-effective
products to improve the quality of life and clean up the environment.
Green Star Products and its Consortium are involved in the production of
renewable clean-burning biodiesel and other products, including
lubricants, additives and devices that reduce emissions and improve fuel
economy in vehicles, machinery and power plants. For more information,
see Green Star Products' Web site at http://www.GreenStarUSA.com,
or call Investor Relations at 619-864-4010, or fax 619-789-4743, or
email info@GreenStarUSA.com.
Information about trading prices and volume can be obtained at several
Internet sites, including http://www.pinksheets.com,
http://www.bloomberg.com and http://www.bigcharts.com
under the ticker symbol "GSPI".
Forward-looking statements in the release are made pursuant to the
"safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, including without limitation, continued
acceptance of the company's products, increased levels of competition
for the company, new products and technological changes, the company's
dependence on third-party suppliers, and other risks detailed from time
to time in the company's periodic filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
MULTIMEDIA GALLERY http://www.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/mmg.cgi?eid=5542373
Post Comment: Trackback URL: http://www.prweb.com/pingpr.php/RmFsdS1DcmFzLUhvcnItWmV0YS1UaGlyLVplcm8=
Bookmark -
Del.icio.us |
Digg |
Furl It |
Spurl |
RawSugar |
Simpy |
Shadows |
Blink It |
My Web
|
Share The News
Submit this press release easily to any of these major bookmarking and social media sites.