Zofran Attorneys Offer Birth Defects Case Profiles
St. Louis, MO (PRWEB) April 10, 2015 -- The Zofran lawsuit website of attorneys handling claims nationwide has been expanded to include a new lawsuit news page*. The page will serve as a clearinghouse for news on Zofran lawsuits filed nationwide, as well as new birth defects warning information and other relevant news. Today, a new Zofran lawsuit case profile has been made available. The case** was filed in U.S. District Court in Northern Alabama by a mother who alleges her son developed significant birth defects as a result of her having taken the anti-nausea medication during her pregnancy. These Zofran attorneys provide case profiles and Zofran lawsuit information as a public resource, in addition to regular new updates at the new News page.
The plaintiff in the new case profile, Julie Hunter, took Zofran during January of 2006, when she was pregnant, according to court documents. Hunter’s son, Talon, was born in August of the same year; in the days and months following his birth, doctors discovered myriad birth defects, according to court documents. The suit alleges that these birth defects are not congenital, based on testing of the child’s parents, but are linked to his exposure to Zofran in utero, according to court documents. This Zofran lawsuit asserts that GlaxoSmithKline, the international pharmaceutical company responsible for manufacturing and marketing the drug, knew or should have known of the risks it posed to pregnant women and their babies, and should have warned the public of such risks, according to court documents.
Lawyers providing nationwide Zofran lawsuit representation believe that parents of children who were born with birth defects and health problems following exposure to Zofran during prenatal development may be entitled to real compensation by filing a Zofran lawsuit. Nationally-renowned for groundbreaking work in drug and product safety litigation against multi-billion dollar corporations, the Onder Law Firm’s Zofran lawyers have committed their significant resources to providing expert legal representation to women, children and families who believe they may have grounds to file Zofran lawsuits. Individuals and family members of individuals who meet this description are entitled to a no-cost, no-obligation consultation through the firm’s Zofran lawsuit website.
The Onder Law Firm welcomes Zofran lawsuit case inquiries from law firms in regards to handling them or working as co-counsel.
About The Onder Law Firm
Onder, Shelton, O’Leary & Peterson, LLC is a St. Louis based personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The pharmaceutical and medical device litigators at The Onder Law Firm have represented thousands of Americans in lawsuits against multinational conglomerates from products liability for manufacture of defective or dangerous products to deceptive advertising practices. Other firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation. It is also a recognized leader in products liability cases such as window blind cord strangulation. The Onder Law Firm offers information from attorneys handling talcum powder lawsuits at http://www.ZofranBirthDefectsLawsuitCenter.com.
*http://www.zofranbirthdefectslawsuitcenter.com/news
**Julie Hunter and Talon Hunter v GlaxoSmithKline et al, Case No. 2:15-cv-00544-JEO, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama, filed 4/1/15
Michael Gudeman, Gudeman Group, +1 314-614-8709, [email protected]
Share this article